Abonneren
Likoed Nederland
  • Home
  • Publicaties
    • Artikelen
    • Brieven
    • Persberichten
    • Acties
  • Achtergronden
  • Geselecteerd
    • Clips Palestijnse televisie
    • Video’s
    • Uit de pers
    • Historische documenten
    • Nederlandse links
  • De Nederlandse media
    • Ongehoord Palestijns nieuws
    • Dossier: media leugens
    • De Nederlandse media: niet evenwichtig
    • Kennisquiz Midden-Oosten
  • English
    • Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
    • Clips of Palestinian television
    • Video’s
    • Arab Extremism
    • From the Press
    • Historic documents
    • Israeli Government Points of View
    • Likud Policy Statements
    • English links
    • About Likud
  • Over ons
    • Contact
    • Steun ons – support
    • Over Likoed
Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
Likoed Nederland
Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
Likoed Nederland
Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
Home English From the Press

Perpetuating refugees

19 februari 2007
in From the Press
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Tweet
Share
Pin
Share

February 19, 2007.

In 1949, the UN established a special agency for Palestinian refugees, the UN
Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA). All other refugees,
regardless of degree of plight and objective hardship, are looked after by the UN
High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR).

According to UNRWA’s Web site, here is the difference between the UN’s two
refugee organizations: “UNRWA is mandated to provide the Palestine refugees
with humanitarian assistance, whereas UNHCR has the mandate to provide
international protection to refugees who fall within the scope of its Statute and
to seek permanent solutions for the problem of refugees by assisting
Governments.” (emphasis added)

In other words, UNHCR’s job is to help governments settle refugees. UNRWA’s
job is to help governments perpetuate a refugee problem which, UNRWA points
out, has now been extended over four generations.

Last week UNRWA launched a drive to increase contributions and divulged that
the Arab countries – their inflammatory rhetoric notwithstanding – are the most
tightfisted of UNRWA donor countries.

Of UNRWA’s $462 million 2006 budget, $137m. came from the US, $41m.
from Sweden, $27m. from the UK and $12m. from Denmark. Saudi Arabia, the
world’s richest oil-producer, managed to scrape a mere $1.2m. Smaller Kuwait
managed a tad more with $1.5m., still a drop in its overflowing oil bucket. The
rest of the Arab states are even less generous. Oil-rich Bahrain spared no more
than $30,000. Indeed the Arab world’s share has declined. In the 1980s it
financed 8% of UNRWA’s outlay. By 2006 it put in less than 3%.

There’s something inordinately wrong with this picture even by the standards of
realpolitik. The very nations responsible for keeping the “refugees” displaced,
who spur them to pursue irredentist goals and who whip up lust for revenge, do
least for them. But the paucity of Arab contributions to UNRWA is just the tip
of the iceberg of Arab cynicism with respect to the refugee question.

What possible reason, for example, could there be for the Palestinian Authority,
together with UNRWA and the Arab world, to maintain “refugee camps” in the
Gaza Strip? Israel, after all, has withdrawn completely from Gaza, including
dismantling settlements and even moving cemeteries.

This was the moment the Palestinians claimed to be waiting for – complete
territorial contiguity and not a single Israeli settler, roadblock, or military base in
sight. Israel’s withdrawal freed up substantial tracts of prime real estate. Yet
nothing has been done to help these people find permanent homes.

By unnaturally perpetuating a problem for generations, the Palestinians give the
lie to their own claims to promote a peaceful two-state solution. This becomes
self-evident when we consider the different definitions for “refugee” to which
UNHCR and UNRWA resort. UNHCR’s refugee is one who “owing to a
well-founded fear of being persecuted – is outside the country of his
nationality.” By this definition the refugee’s descendants aren’t refugees.
Florida-born children of Cuban refugees are no longer considered homeless.

The only exceptions are the Palestinians. UNRWA classifies as refugees any
Arabs, native or not, who sojourned “in Palestine between June 1946 and May
1948, and lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948
Arab-Israeli conflict.” Not only could an itinerant foreign Arab laborer claim
Palestinian refugee status, but UNRWA stipulates that the right extends to
“descendants of persons who became refugees in 1948.”

By UNHCR’s yardsticks, over 95% of those whom UNRWA regards as refugees
are nothing of the sort.

The time has come not to sway Arab oil-moguls to loosen their purse-strings
but to impress on Western donors, particularly the US, to cease shelling out
millions that only impede peace, to bring the UNRWA travesty to its overdue
end and transfer its residue responsibilities to UNHCR. The Arab states need to
start showing that peace, not Israel’s destruction, is their solution to the
refugee problem, and to stop doing their best to perpetuate the problem
themselves.

Tweet
Share
Pin
Share

Gerelateerd Artikelen

Hamas children 2 (X)
Artikelen

Protesten in Gaza geven hoop

by Awi
31 maart 2025
0

  Opinie-artikel van Likoed Nederland op Nieuwrechts, 31 maart 2025.   De afgelopen dagen werd er door duizenden Gazanen geprotesteerd...

Lees meerDetails
Ariel en Kfir Bibas

Staat NPO tegenwoordig voor Nederlands-Palestijnse Omroep?

24 februari 2025

Gazanen uit Gaza?

12 februari 2025
Gaza kindergarten graduation (Twitter)

De overbevolking van Gaza: slecht voor iedereen

7 februari 2025
we desire death like you desire life

Hamas of Israël, dood of leven

21 januari 2025
Jawlani (bron X)

Een ongewisse toekomst voor Syrië

17 januari 2025
Volgend Artikel

Over 100 Children murdered by Palestinian terrorists 2000 - 2005

Hamas-Fatah Agreement does not meet requirements of the international community

  • Over Likoed
  • Steun ons
  • Contact

© 1997 - 2022 Overname van artikelen is toegestaan en wordt zelfs zeer op prijs gesteld, onder voorwaarde van bronvermelding en een link naar het originele artikel op likoed.nl.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
  • Home
  • Publicaties
    • Artikelen
    • Brieven
    • Persberichten
    • Acties
  • Achtergronden
  • Geselecteerd
    • Clips Palestijnse televisie
    • Video’s
    • Uit de pers
    • Historische documenten
    • Nederlandse links
  • De Nederlandse media
    • Ongehoord Palestijns nieuws
    • Dossier: media leugens
    • De Nederlandse media: niet evenwichtig
    • Kennisquiz Midden-Oosten
  • English
    • Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
    • Clips of Palestinian television
    • Video’s
    • Arab Extremism
    • From the Press
    • Historic documents
    • Israeli Government Points of View
    • Likud Policy Statements
    • English links
    • About Likud
  • Over ons
    • Contact
    • Steun ons – support
    • Over Likoed

© 1997 - 2022 Overname van artikelen is toegestaan en wordt zelfs zeer op prijs gesteld, onder voorwaarde van bronvermelding en een link naar het originele artikel op likoed.nl.