• Vrijdag, 20 September 2019
  • 20 Elul, 5779

Likoed Nederland

Sharon changes Mid-East equation

Maandag, April 19, 2004 / Last Modified: Zondag, Januari 14, 2018

Analysis by Paul Reynolds, April 19, 2004.

The dust has settled a bit after Mr Sharon’s visit to Washington and it is clear that his plan has produced one of those Middle East moments when everything has changed.

It does not mean that the conflict will not continue. It obviously will. But the
terms of the conflict have been altered.

The so-called roadmap to peace, the plan drawn up by the quartet of the UN,
the US, the EU and Russia, had already been exposed as unrealistic. It has now
in reality been rolled up. Claims by President George W Bush and the UK Prime
Minister Tony Blair that

somehow the roadmap is being implemented by the Sharon plan cannot
be taken too literally.

What they mean is that negotiations can and should continue.

New terms

But it will be on a new basis.

The Palestinians will have to accept as facts two principles which they wanted
to be the subject of negotiations.

One is the permanence of major Israeli settlements on the West Bank.

The other is that Palestinian refugees from earlier wars will not be
allowed back into what is now Israel.

This is a major blow for the Palestinians, as Mr Sharon, in candid remarks
before he left for Washington, said it was designed to be.

He even suggested that it could preclude a Palestinian state.

It is possible that he could be wrong on that, but certainly if the
Palestinians eventually choose to talk on the new basis, their state will be a
small and fragmented place.

What Palestinians could gain

The US and UK will argue that the Palestinians have gained something.

They will get an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and the major Israeli
settlements named as permanent do not include many others whose future is
presumably for negotiation.

The Sharon plan and the Bush backing for it stand comparison with other
moments when great powers have helped shape the politics of the
Israeli/Palestinian conflict

They will also argue that many small and fragmented states have done rather
well.

Many Palestinians, however, might not choose to talk but to fight.

Other defining moments

The Sharon plan and the Bush backing for it stand comparison with other
moments when great powers have helped shape the politics of the
Israeli/Palestinian conflict.

In 1917, the then superpower Great Britain, through the Declaration named
after the Foreign Secretary Lord Balfour, promised a “national home for the
Jewish people in Palestine”.

The Balfour Declaration, bitterly recalled to any British visitor to any
Palestinian refugee camp, set the scene for large scale Jewish immigration and
settlement while supposedly safeguarding the “civil and religious rights of the
non-Jewish communities”.

This dual aim proved impossible to sustain and in 1939, Britain reshaped the
terms again with a White Paper which severely restricted Jewish immigration
for five years and then gave Palestinians a veto on any more, thereby aiming to
prevent the emergence of a State of Israel.

This plan, too, eventually collapsed and Britain withdrew.

Then the Israelis started creating further facts on the ground.

Sharon’s role

Mr Sharon played his own significant role in creating those facts, in peace and
in war.

He has sometime been successful. His crossing of the Suez Canal in the 1973
war with Egypt, which threatened the encirclement of the Egyptian army, is
already a classic text in the history books.

But not always. His invasion of Lebanon in 1982, designed to end Palestinian
resistance, is also a classic for different reasons. It failed.

It is not possible to say whether his latest plan will work or not. And of course
what works for one side does not necessarily work for the other.

But it has created new political facts which will have to be taken into
account.

Mr Sharon is doing as a politician what he did as a soldier. He is trying to define
the battlefield.

It is also possible, probable even, that nothing will happen diplomatically
and that Israel will withdraw into a Biblical type “stronghold” of the type
favoured by the Old Testament warrior Gideon, whose exploits provided the
inspiration for the modern Israeli military.

The barrier now being put up by the Israeli government between Israelis
and Palestinians is perhaps evidence that this is already happening.

-- Reacties gesloten.