Abonneren
Likoed Nederland
  • Home
  • Publicaties
    • Artikelen
    • Brieven
    • Persberichten
    • Acties
  • Achtergronden
  • Geselecteerd
    • Clips Palestijnse televisie
    • Video’s
    • Uit de pers
    • Historische documenten
    • Nederlandse links
  • De Nederlandse media
    • Ongehoord Palestijns nieuws
    • Dossier: media leugens
    • De Nederlandse media: niet evenwichtig
    • Kennisquiz Midden-Oosten
  • English
    • Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
    • Clips of Palestinian television
    • Video’s
    • Arab Extremism
    • From the Press
    • Historic documents
    • Israeli Government Points of View
    • Likud Policy Statements
    • English links
    • About Likud
  • Over ons
    • Contact
    • Steun ons – support
    • Over Likoed
Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
Likoed Nederland
Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
Likoed Nederland
Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
Home English From the Press

Gibson’s blood libel

5 maart 2004
in From the Press
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Tweet
Share
Pin
Share

By Charles Krauthammer, March 5, 2004.

Every people has its story. Every people has the right to its story. And every
people has a responsibility for its story.

Muslims have their story: God’s revelation to the final prophet.

Jews have their story: the covenant between man and God at Sinai.

Christians have their story too: the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ. Why is
this story different from other stories? Because it is not a family affair of
coreligionists. If it were, few people outside the circle of believers would be
concerned about it. This particular story involves other people. With the notable
exception of a few Romans, these people are Jews. And in the story, they
come off rather badly.

Because of that peculiarity, the crucifixion is not just a story; it is a story with
its own story — a history of centuries of relentless, and at times savage,
persecution of Jews in Christian lands.

This history is what moved Vatican II, in a noble act of theological
reflection, to decree in 1965 that the Passion of Christ should henceforth be
understood with great care so as to unteach the lesson that had been taught for
almost two millennia: that the Jews were Christ killers.

Vatican II did not question the Gospels. It did not disavow its own central story.
It took responsibility for it, and for the baleful history it had spawned.
Recognizing that all words, even God’s words, are necessarily subject to human
interpretation, it ordered an understanding of those words that was most
conducive to recognizing the humanity and innocence of the Jewish people.

The Vatican did that for good reason. The blood libel that this story affixed
upon the Jewish people had led to countless Christian massacres of Jews and
prepared Europe for the ultimate massacre — 6 million Jews systematically
murdered in six years — in the heart, alas, of a Christian continent. It is no
accident Vatican II occurred just two decades after the Holocaust, indeed in its
shadow.

Which is what makes Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ” such a singular
act of interreligious aggression. He openly rejects the Vatican II teaching and,
using every possible technique of cinematic exaggeration, gives us the
pre-Vatican II story of the villainous Jews.

His Leni Riefenstahl defense — I had other intentions — does not wash. Of
course he had other intentions: evangelical, devotional, commercial. When you
retell a story in which the role of the Jews is central, and take care to give it
the most invidious, pre-Vatican II treatment possible, you can hardly claim, “I
didn’t mean it.”

His other defense is that he is just telling the Gospel story.

Nonsense. There is no single Gospel story of the Passion; there are
subtle differences among the four accounts. Moreover, every text lends itself to
interpretation. There have been dozens of cinematic renditions of this story,
from Griffith to Pasolini to Zeffirelli.

Gibson contradicts his own literalist defense when he speaks of his right
to present his artistic vision. Artistic vision means personal interpretation.

And Gibson’s personal interpretation is spectacularly vicious. Three of the
Gospels have but a one-line reference to Jesus’s scourging. The fourth has no
reference at all.

In Gibson’s movie this becomes 10 minutes of the most unremitting
sadism in the history of film. Why 10? Why not five? Why not two? Why not
zero, as in Luke? Gibson chose 10.

In none of the Gospels does the high priest Caiaphas stand there with his cruel,
impassive fellow priests witnessing the scourging.

In Gibson’s movie they do.

When it comes to the Jews, Gibson deviates from the Gospels — glorying in his
artistic vision — time and again. He bends, he stretches, he makes stuff up. And
these deviations point overwhelmingly in a single direction — to the villainy and
culpability of the Jews.

The most subtle, and most revolting, of these has to my knowledge not been
commented upon. In Gibson’s movie, Satan appears four times. Not one of
these appearances occurs in the four Gospels. They are pure invention. Twice,
this sinister, hooded, androgynous embodiment of evil is found . . . where?
Moving among the crowd of Jews.

Gibson’s camera follows close up, documentary style, as Satan glides
among them, his face popping up among theirs — merging with, indeed,
defining the murderous Jewish crowd. After all, a perfect match: Satan’s own
people.

Perhaps this should not be surprising, coming from a filmmaker whose public
pronouncements on the Holocaust are as chillingly ambiguous and carefully
calibrated as that of any sophisticated Holocaust denier.

Not surprising from a man who says: “I don’t want to lynch any Jews. I
mean, it’s like it’s not what I’m about. I love them. I pray for them.”

Spare us such love.

Tweet
Share
Pin
Share

Gerelateerd Artikelen

arab rights
Persberichten

Terreur en antisemitisme onderbelicht in klachten over Op1

by Awi
30 januari 2023
0

Persbericht van Likoed Nederland, 31 januari 2023.   Likoed Nederland heeft een klacht ingediend tegen de uitzending van Op1 waarin...

Lees meer
apartheid islamitische majoor Ella Waweya (foto IDF)

NPO-Ombudsman bekritiseerde Apartheid beschuldiging al eerder

11 januari 2023
Hamas planet Earth

Actiesucces: Nu.nl rectificeert de doelstelling van Hamas

10 januari 2023
Buitenhof apartheid

VPRO-Buitenhof had kritisch moeten zijn tegen Israël-hater

21 december 2022
Israel babies

Israël: veilig, gezond en gelukkig

13 december 2022
Wereldheerschappij

Wereldheerschappij: Joden of reptielen?

13 november 2022
Volgend Artikel

Palestijnse gebieden hebben geen internationaal erkende grenzen

Arafat's thug brigades running cities

  • Over Likoed
  • Steun ons
  • Contact

© 1997 - 2022 Overname van artikelen is toegestaan en wordt zelfs zeer op prijs gesteld, onder voorwaarde van bronvermelding en een link naar het originele artikel op likoed.nl.

Geen resultaat
Toon alle resultaten
  • Home
  • Publicaties
    • Artikelen
    • Brieven
    • Persberichten
    • Acties
  • Achtergronden
  • Geselecteerd
    • Clips Palestijnse televisie
    • Video’s
    • Uit de pers
    • Historische documenten
    • Nederlandse links
  • De Nederlandse media
    • Ongehoord Palestijns nieuws
    • Dossier: media leugens
    • De Nederlandse media: niet evenwichtig
    • Kennisquiz Midden-Oosten
  • English
    • Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
    • Clips of Palestinian television
    • Video’s
    • Arab Extremism
    • From the Press
    • Historic documents
    • Israeli Government Points of View
    • Likud Policy Statements
    • English links
    • About Likud
  • Over ons
    • Contact
    • Steun ons – support
    • Over Likoed

© 1997 - 2022 Overname van artikelen is toegestaan en wordt zelfs zeer op prijs gesteld, onder voorwaarde van bronvermelding en een link naar het originele artikel op likoed.nl.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In