Fifteen things I don’t understand about the Mideast peace process

Fifteen things I don’t understand about the Mideast peace process

By Rabbi Ephraim Shore, the Israel Director for HonestReporting.com and the
Hasbara Fellowships for campus Israel activism. Prior to making aliyah, he was
Executive Director of Aish HaTorah in Miami and Toronto.

Aish, September 14, 2003.

Ten years after Oslo, am I imagining things — or is the situation truly insane?

1. If Palestinians want to live side-by-side with Israel, then why do all
   government logos and websites show Palestine encompassing all of Israel, with
   Israel nonexistent?
2. If a primary point of the road map is “confronting all those engaged in
   terror and dismantlement of terrorist capabilities and infrastructure,” then why
   do the Palestinians demand that Israel release thousands of terrorists from
   prison, an item not even included in the road map? Instead, shouldn’t the
   Palestinians be arresting terrorists themselves? And shouldn’t we be outraged
   that the two suicide bombers who murdered 15 Israelis on Sept. 9, 2003 (Hillel
   Cafe and Tzrifin bus stop) were among a group of Palestinian prisoners released
   by Israel this year? (Jerusalem Post, Sept. 12, 2003)
3. If Israel is supposedly allowed to “take all necessary steps to defend its
   citizens,” then why is Israel condemned for building bypass roads so drivers can
   avoid ambushes, condemned for building a fence to keep suicide bombers out,
   condemned for targeted killings of terrorist leaders, condemned for operating
   road blocks to screen for suicide bombers, condemned for clearing areas used
   for launching rockets, and condemned for keeping terrorists in jail? How exactly
   is Israel expected to defend itself?
4. When the PLO first demanded a state in 1964, it wanted every part of
   Israel except the West Bank and Gaza (which were then in the hands of Jordan
   and Egypt). Is it reasonable to assume that they now want only the West Bank
   and Gaza, or is that more likely a Trojan Horse– as Palestinian leader Faisal
   al-Husseini described it in 2001 as a first step to destroy Israel.
5. Why is the targeted killing of terrorists and their supporters lauded when
   done by the United States in Iraq, but not when done by Israel whose civilians
   face a daily threat of terror attacks?
6. Why has the United Nations passed far more condemnations against
   Israel than any other country — including Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Chechnya, Saudi
   Arabia, Liberia, North Korea, and China combined — while millions were
   massacred in these other places? And then how does the UN expect Israel to
   accept it as an impartial mediator?
7. Why — if the Palestinian Authority has little freedom of speech and
   freedom of the press, little religious tolerance, is oppressive of Christians and
   other minorities, is corrupt at all levels of government, and is rife with
   vigilantism — is the creation of a Palestinian state a favorite “liberal” cause?
8. Why — after Yasser Arafat has proven for 40 years to be one of history’s
   most incorrigible terrorists, while loyally backing dictators like Saddam Hussein
   — does the European Union still strongly support Arafat’s leadership?
9. Why does the media call it “terror” when Al Qaeda strikes at Western
   targets, but not when Hamas strikes at Israelis (or even American citizens in
   Israel)?
10. If the Palestinians truly want peace, why do their school textbooks vilify
    Israel and glorify suicide bombers? Why does the government-controlled TV
    station broadcast virulent anti-Semitic messages? Why do mosques regularly
    incite followers to jihad? Why are (UN supported) children’s paramilitary training
    camps — masquerading as summer camps — named in honor of the most
    “successful” Palestinian terrorists (an indoctrination process that has resulted in
    60-80% support for suicide bombings>?
11. Why does the world call the West Bank “occupied” if it never belonged to
    the Palestinians? [Jordan controlled the West Bank for 19 years after
    conquering it in a war of aggression. It previously belonged to the Mamelukes,
    the Crusaders, the Ottoman Turks, and then Britain.]
12. What other country would give control of its holiest spot (the Temple
    Mount) to another religion (which arrived 1,500 years later), and then permit
    them to systematically destroy ancient remains (to eliminate evidence of a
    3,000-year-old Jewish presence) and allow that religious body to prohibit
    access to non-Muslims for three years?
13. Why does anyone doubt Israel’s sincerity for peace, after offering 97
    percent of the West Bank and Gaza in the Taba Talks 2001, and having given
    back the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt — a territory three times the size of Israel
    constituting 91 percent of the territory Israel took control of in the 1967 war?
14. Why does the world demand the uprooting of Jewish settlements —
    effectively making those areas “Judenrein” (empty of Jews)? Would anyone
    tolerate a similar form of ethnic cleansing whereby Israel does not allow Arabs
    to live in areas under Israeli control?
15. If, during Oslo, Israel gave tens of thousands of machine guns and 40%
    of the West Bank and Gaza to the Palestinians (giving them control over 97% of
    their population), in return for the promise that “all future disputes would be
    handled without violence,” and instead Israel got 18,000 terrorist attacks that
    killed 845 and wounded 4,898 people, a collapsed economy, intolerable daily
    life for its citizens, and its holy sites desecrated, why is Israel again being asked
    to negotiate with that same Palestinian leadership, trust their future promises,
    and place its security in their hands?